Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Allied Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 9, 1988No. S86-489PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on separate summary judgment motions filed by defendants Allied Corporation, Burlington Northern Railroad Co. (“Burlington”), and General Electric Railcar Services Corp. (“GERSCO”). Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), has filed a response and the defendants their replies. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 provides jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action.
I. Introduction
On February 4, 1985, anhydrous hydrogen fluoride leaked from a railroad tank car located on Conrail’s property in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Allied Corporation and General Electric Railcar Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Castelli v. SteeleDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988
- Avery v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.