Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Allied Corporation and General Electric Railcar Services Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This case illustrates once again that in litigation, as in so many other areas of endeavor, the first move may spell the difference between success and failure. Plaintiff’s first move was to bring its action in federal district court in Indiana. As a result, the district court was obliged to use Indiana substantive law to decide the legal issues in the case. The district court held that under Indiana law the plaintiff could not state a cause of action and thus dismissed the case as to these defendants. 692 F.Supp. 924. We affirm.
I
On February 3, 1985, a tank car located at…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sink & Edwards, Inc. v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walter Kaczmarek and Theresa Kaczmarek v. Allied Chemical Corporation, United States Steel Corporation, and Ever-Tite Coupling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Simon v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg and Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., and Peg GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Soo Line Railroad Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Third-Party v. David Bruce Overton, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.