Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1941No. L. A. 16759Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 Cal.2d 576 (1941)

CITY OF PASADENA (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant,

v.

CALIFORNIA-MICHIGAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.

L. A. No. 16759.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 8, 1941.

Harold P. Huls, City Attorney, and Thomas W. LeSage, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.

Goodspeed, McGuire, Harris and Pfaff for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

This is an action for injunction and damages based on the defendant's alleged past and threatened future invasion of certain easements owned by the plaintiff. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and from a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API