Legal Opinion

Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical Center

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 2013No. A136695PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

Cross-defendant Eden Medical Center (EMC) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 (section 1717). The motion was denied after cross-complainant Eden Township Healthcare District (District) unsuccessfully sought declaratory relief to have certain agreements declared illegal and void under Government Code section 1090. EMC claims the court erred in finding that the action on which EMC prevailed was not “on a contract” within the meaning of section 1717. We agree and reverse, and remand to the lower court to award EMC…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. R.W.L. Enters. v. Oldcastle, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. California-American Water Co. v. Marina Coast Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Dorsey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. In re GiustoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Sutter Health v. Eden Township Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API