Legal Opinion

Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2000No. B128565PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. (Sessions) did not sign and was not a party to a written contract between defendant general contractor Noble Construction Company, Inc. (Noble) and David Mackey Drywall (Mackey). The Noble-Mackey contract provided that the prevailing party in an action to enforce the contract would receive attorney fees. After sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend to Sessions’s third party beneficiary breach of contract claim against Noble, the trial court awarded attorney fees in favor of Noble based on the contractual attorney…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Renwick v. Bennett (In re Bennett)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Apex LLC v. Korusfood.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group v. PacifiCareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API