Legal Opinion

Sutter Health v. Eden Township Healthcare District

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 2016No. A146002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

Appellant Sutter Health (Sutter) obtained a sizable judgment against respondent Eden Township Healthcare District (District). More than a year after the judgment was entered, the District filed a motion under Government Code section 970.6, 1 which permits a local public entity to pay a judgment in up to 10 annual installments upon a showing that prompt payment would impose an “unreasonable hardship.” In addition, the District sought to change the rate of postjudgment interest established by the judgment to the interest rate specified by section 984, subdivision (e)(2), which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Williams v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API