Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided August 3, 1936No. Case 1 — Water Supply SystemPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
— This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the City Clerk of Vero Beach as such officer in his said capacity as City Clerk of Vero Beach, a municipal corporation, to attest each and all of certain water revenue certificates, described in the alternative writ of mandamus of said city dated December 1, 1935, each of the denomination of $500.00 and numbered 1 to 20, by affixing to each of said water revenue certificates his signature in his said capacity of City Clerk of the City of Vero Beach and by affixing to each-of said water revenue certificates the corporate seal of the said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of EqualizersSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- State ex rel. Knott v. HaskellSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Board of Elections v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State ex rel. Baas v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- State Ex Rel. City of Daytona Beach v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marvin v. Housing Authority of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Williams v. the Town of DunnellonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State v. Florida State Improvement CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Hink v. Board of Directors of Beaver Water DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- State v. City of Fort PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.