Legal Opinion

State v. City of Fort Pierce

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal is taken from a final decree validating $170,000.00 of revenue certificates authorized by an ordinance of the City of Fort Pierce, for the payment of which the future net revenues of the City’s electric light and water system were pledged. The proceeds of the certificates when sold are to be used in paying-for needed extensions of the electric light plant.

The only new question presented by this record is whether the pledging of the net revenues of both plants — the waterworks plant as well as the electric plant — can be validly made without approval at an election held pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Williams v. the Town of DunnellonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Board County Commrs., Pinellas County v. HerrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. State v. City of Fort MyersSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. Brooks v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Hess v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. State of Florida v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API