Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Daytona Beach v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 29, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By a proceeding in mandamus brought by the municipality of Daytona Beach against the respondent, E. H. Armstrong, its mayor-commissioner, the City seeks to compel its mayor-commissioner to affix his signature as such officer to certain described municipal refunding bonds in the custody and possession of the City Clerk, and awaiting negotiation on behalf of the municipality.

The alternative writ alleges that the City of Daytona Beach is a duly incorporated and existing municipality; that under Chapter 15151, Special Acts of 1931, laws of Florida, certain refunding bonds were authorized to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Venice v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Village of Chisholm v. TraskSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. City of Independence v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API