Hink v. Board of Directors of Beaver Water District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
By this proceeding, which is apparently a test suit, the appellants as citizens and taxpayers seek to obtain a declaratory judgment and an injunction preventing the appellees from carrying out a proposed arrangement by which four cities in northwest Arkansas are undertaking to obtain a supplementary water supply. The chancellor found the proposal to be valid in all respects, sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and dismissed the suit.
For some years it has been the policy of the federal government to permit some part of the water impounded in federally owned lakes and reservoirs to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delony v. RuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Williams v. Harris, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- McGehee v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- State Ex Rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Luter v. Pulaski County Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Lead Hill v. Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Lyon v. White River-Grand Prairie Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Government Service Automation, Inc. v. Faulkner CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.