Harold D. Miller, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

It is contended that the order appealed from is unlawful because its effect is to authorize and consent to the *55sale of part of a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by tbe Public Utilities Commission to a motor transportation company.

It is obvious that that is its effect.

In Braddock v. Public Utilities Commission (1940), 137 Ohio St. 59, 27 N. E. 2d 1016, the syllabus reads:

“Under the provisions of Sections 614-87 and 614-87a, General Code [now Sections 4921.10 and 4921.13, Revised Code], the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio is not vested with authority, express or…