Stony's Trucking Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Stony’s argues that it was unreasonable and unlawful for the commission to deny its application to alter or amend 784-1. We disagree and affirm the order of the commission.
Stony’s application was filed pursuant to R.C. 4921.10, which provides, in part, that “[t]he commission may, for good cause, * * * revoke, alter, or amend any certificate issued under sections 4921.02 to 4921.32 of the Revised Code.”
Appellant admits that the application was brought to “split” a certificate, with the intent of transferring a portion of the authority in a subsequent proceeding. The law is well-settled,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Braddock v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Harold D. Miller, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967