Legal Opinion

Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1925No. 18776PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On and prior to March 7, 1923, the Buckeye Transportation Company, an Ohio corporation, was engaged as a common carrier transporting persons by means of motor busses from Dayton, Ohio, to Hamilton, Ohio, and on the 7th day of March, 1923, a receiver was appointed for such corporation by the court of common pleas of Montgomery county, Ohio, and by order of the court the business of transporting persons by busses over the public highway between those points was continued until the 20th day of June, 1923.

On July 27, 1923, the physical assets of the corporation, including the busses used in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westhoven v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Gilmer v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Russell v. CalhounWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API