Stuff v. Simmons
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Plaintiffs, Kelly E. Stuff (Kelly) and Ken B. Stuff (Ken) (collectively, the Stuffs), appeal the trial court's decision to grant Appellee-Defendant's, Zachary L. Simmons (Simmons), Motion to Compel Kelly to Submit for Neuropsycho-logical Examination pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 85.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
ISSUE
The Stuffs raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion by ordering Kelly to undergo an independent neuropsychological examination pursuant to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Coates v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local No. 33District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibbs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ledden v. KuzmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Crawford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Minnick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.