Legal Opinion

Stuff v. Simmons

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2005No. 49A02-0505-CV-416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Kelly E. Stuff (Kelly) and Ken B. Stuff (Ken) (collectively, the Stuffs), appeal the trial court's decision to grant Appellee-Defendant's, Zachary L. Simmons (Simmons), Motion to Compel Kelly to Submit for Neuropsycho-logical Examination pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 85.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

ISSUE

The Stuffs raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion by ordering Kelly to undergo an independent neuropsychological examination pursuant to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Coates v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
  4. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local No. 33District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ledden v. KuzmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Crawford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Minnick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API