Legal Opinion

Coates v. Whittington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1988No. C-7314PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Judge.

At issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether a plaintiff who claims mental anguish damages in a personal injury action may be required to submit to a mental examination. In the underlying case, relator Myrna Coates sued Drackett Products Company for injuries she sustained while using Drackett’s oven cleaner. She claimed both physical and mental anguish damages, and Drackett alleged that Mrs. Coates had been contributorily negligent. Drackett moved for an order compelling Mrs. Coates to submit to a mental examination pursuant to Rule 167a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Moore v. LilleboTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Thompson v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Lowe v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Lenhard v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Krishnan v. SepulvedaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Blankenship v. Mirick, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  5. Katy Springs & Manufacturing, Inc. v. FavaloraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API