Legal Opinion

City of Klamath Falls v. Environmental Quality Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1994No. CA A72620; SC S40270PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

This proceeding arises from an Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) contested case order denying certification to the City of Klamath Falls’ proposed Salt Cave hydroelectric project. The EQC denied certification on the basis of a regulation that limits development-caused changes in the temperature of river water. On judicial review, the Court of Appeals affirmed, and we allowed review of that decision. At issue is whether the EQC’s interpretation and application of OAR 340-41-965(2)(b)(A), 1 a regulation or standard prohibiting water temperature changes caused by development, is in error.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Columbia Steel Castings Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Marteeny v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Lee v. Oregon Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API