Strawn v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) in which, following the revocation of petitioner’s parole, the board denied his re-release on parole and reset his parole release date. Petitioner asserts that the board erred in doing so because, according to petitioner, by that date, the relevant indeterminate sentence will have expired. We affirm.
We take the following relevant facts from the record on judicial review. In 1983 and 1984, petitioner was convicted in separate Linn County cases of two counts of unauthorized use of a vehicle…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Selfridge v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dizick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Strawn v. BELLEQUECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Washington v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015