Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Belleque
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 15, 2006No. 05C-11516; A127929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*297LINDER, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment denying, sua sponte, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See ORS 34.370(6) (providing that court may, on its own motion, enter a judgment denying a meritless petition).1 On appeal, he raises four assignments of error; we write to address only one of his arguments, rejecting the others without discussion. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
We recite the facts relevant to the issues raised on appeal in a manner consistent with the allegations in plaintiffs 46-page handwritten petition. Plaintiff alleged that, in September 2004, Department of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Charles M. Keenan v. Frank Hall, Director Oregon Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Dunn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Barrett v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006