Legal Opinion

Witter v. Andrews

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1898No. L. A. No. 301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. Y. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to enforce payment of an assessment for street work. Judgment was given for defendants on motion for nonsuit, from which and from the order granting defendants’ motion plaintiff appeals. The judgment was filed and entered June 26, 1896, and notice of judgment was served June 27th. The record shows the following: July 6th, plaintiff served his proposed statement on appeal; on July 11th, defendants served proposed amendments to statement; July 15th plaintiff delivered to the judge the proposed statement and amendments; July 30th, plaintiff served notice on defendants that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Gallardo v. Atl. & Pac. Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Jue Fook Sam v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sauer v. Eagle Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lesure v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Lester v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API