People v. Crane
California Supreme Court
Application for writ of mandamus to A. M. Crane, Superior Judge of Alameda County.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
The Code makes no provision for the settlement of a “statement on appeal.” It provides for the settlement of “a statement of the case.” But that can not he settled until after a notice of a motion for a new trial has been served. Such statement, when settled, may be used on the motion for a new trial, and afterwards on an appeal, if one be taken, from the judgment. (C. C. P., 950.)
The relator did not serve a notice of motion for a new trial, and therefore is not entitled to have “a statement of the case,” to be used on a motion for a new trial settled. And it appears that he did not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by15 opinions
- Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Keane v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1885
- Bradbury v. Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Sauer v. Eagle Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.