Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Ingle

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1908No. S.F. No. 5080PublishedCited by 10 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal in this action.

On May 28, 1907, appellant served a notice of intention to move for a new trial in the above cause, the motion to be made on the minutes of the court, and in due time, on October 14, 1907, the motion was heard and denied, and on December 12, 1907, appellant appealed from the order denying the motion. On December 17, 1907, appellant served on respondent his proposed statement on appeal, to which respondent, without waiving certain objections to the proposed statement, proposed amendments thereto and served them on appellant on December 19,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Moultrie v. TarpioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Dernham v. BagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mellor v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ryer v. Rio Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keating v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jansson v. National Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Weaver v. FickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API