Legal Opinion

Lesure v. Hutton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1921No. Civ. No. 3544PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff. Appellants complain of certain alleged errors of law occurring at the trial, but respondent contends that there is before us no properly authenticated record upon which we may base a consideration of the questions appellants seek to present. The appeal was taken under the original as distinguished from what is known as the alternative method of appeal.

The printed transcript on appeal contains a number of pages of matter under the heading, “Statement on Motion for a New Trial,” but there is nothing in the record to show that the statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Sauer v. Eagle Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Muzzy v. D. H. McEwen Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Knox v. SchragCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Witter v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Los Angeles Bar Ass'n v. California Protective Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Gee v. Fong PoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API