Legal Opinion
Haddad v. Francis
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 30, 1986No. File 02061PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnett, J.
In this summary process action, the plaintiff seeks to evict the defendant for failure to pay increases in real estate taxes and insurance premiums. According to the complaint, such defaults are to be treated as defaults in rent pursuant to the lease between the parties.
The defendant contends that the court lacks jurisdiction because his leasehold interest was assigned to PJR, Inc., a Connecticut corporation and the corporation is not a party to the action. With respect to the merits of the plaintiff's claims, the defendant contends that the increases in real estate taxes have been paid, that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Rauch v. Circle TheatreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Perley v. Glastonbury Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kelly v. Alstores Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Haddad v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Shakey's Inc. v. CapleDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.