Legal Opinion
Haddad v. Francis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 26, 1988No. 5273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant tenant is appealing the judgment of immediate possession rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff landlord.
The sole question before us is whether the trial court erred in finding that the defendant’s failure to pay *325any increases in real estate taxes constituted wilfull or gross negligence.
The trial court filed a complete and legally sound memorandum of decision which incorporated the facts found and drew legal conclusions in conformity with applicable law. The trial court’s decision so completely articulates the issues involved and so adequately explains the legal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Faith Center, Inc. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Cantor v. Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Haddad v. FrancisConnecticut Superior Court · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kelly v. Alstores Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Heyman Associates No. 5, L.P. v. FelCor TRS Guarantor, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014