Legal Opinion

Dean v. Riley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 20, 1993No. 11301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiffs, Theodore G. and Beverly H. Dean, appeal from the judgment rendered for the defendants in the plaintiffs’ action to quiet title in a claimed right-of-way over the defendants’ land and to obtain damages, including attorney’s fees and compensatory damages, pursuant to General Statutes § 47-33j.1 The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly found that the claimed easement (1) was not appurtenant to their land and (2) was extinguished. We affirm the judgment.

In 1951, Theodore W. Dean, not a party to this action, took title to approximately seventy acres of land in the town…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Eis v. MeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Stiefel v. LindemannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Bird Peak Road Ass'n v. Bird Peak Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Brabant v. McCarthy, No. Cv96-0070352 (Aug. 9, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API