Legal Opinion

Eis v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 21, 1989No. 13701PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The plaintiffs, Hal and Shirley Eis, instituted an action seeking, inter alia, an injunction prohibiting the defendant, Mary D. Meyer, from obstructing their use of an express easement across her land. The trial court, in accordance with the recommendation of the attorney state trial rpferee, rendered judgment for the plaintiffs, declaring the easement to be in full force and effect and enjoining the defendant from hindering or interfering with the plaintiffs’ use and enjoyment of that easement. The defendant appealed this judgment to the Appellate Court. Upon determining that the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Warner v. KonoverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Southbridge Associates, LLC v. GarofaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. John T. Brady & Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Stefanoni v. DuncanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Sterling National Mortgage Co., Inc. v. Mortgage Corner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API