Legal Opinion

United States v. Schrock

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 27, 1914No. 1374; No. 1375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 34756 (T. D. 34186) and Abstract 35155 (T. D. 34307).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise in this case was invoiced as “lubricating oil” and was imported under the tariff act of August 5, 1909.

The appraiser reported the article to be a “combination of oils,” dutiable as such at the rate of 25 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 3 of the act. This rate of duty was accordingly assessed by the collector.

The importers protested against the assessment, claiming duty upon the merchandise as a nonenumerated manufactured article at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 480 of the act.

The protest was submitted upon evidence to the Board of General Appraisers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Hartranft v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Murray v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Wypenn Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API