Legal Opinion

Hartranft v. Sheppard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 1888No. 191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. ' The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion, prepared by

Mr. Chief Justice Waite,

was delivered by the court as its opinion!

The single question in this case is, whether quilts composed of cotton and eider-down, or silk and eider-down, the eiderdown in each case being the component material of chief value, are dutiable, on importation into the United States, as manufactures of- cotton or of silk, not enumerated, at thirty-five per centum ad valorem if of cotton, and at fifty per centum ad valorem if of silk, or at twenty per centum ad valorem as manufactured articles not enumerated, the latter being the amount…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Dodge & Olcott v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  3. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. SchrockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Dieckerhoff, Raffloer & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API