Legal Opinion
Marlin Oil Corp. v. Barby Energy Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 2002No. 95,915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
11 Defendants/Appellants, Barby Energy Corporation and Bradford Guy Barby (collectively Barby), seek review of the trial court's orders granting judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee, Marlin Oil Corporation (Marlin), and awarding costs, attorney fees, and prejudgment interest to Marlin. We reverse to the extent the trial court awarded prejudgment interest to Marlin, and affirm in all other respects.
T2 Marlin is the operator of two natural gas wells in which Barby owns working and royalty interests. Barby disputed certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Ellison v. EllisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Hetronic International, Inc. v. RempeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015
- In Re Estate of AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013