Legal Opinion

Ellison v. Ellison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1996No. 86696PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The question before us is whether a parent may invoke a child’s psychotherapist-patient privilege to prevent a psychologist from testifying in a proceeding to modify custody based upon allegations of physical and mental abuse suffered by that child. We conclude that she may not.

*2The father and mother were divorced in 1990 in McIntosh County. They have two minor children and the mother is the custodial parent. The children visit the father at his residence in Missouri according to the divorce decree. In 1995 while the children were visiting the father he took them to a child…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Pierson v. CanuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. S.W. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest v. DyerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API