Legal Opinion
Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 4, 2001No. 92,033PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*786LAVENDER, J.
T1 Resolution of today's cause requires the Court (1) to ascertain for comparative-negligence purposes the relevance of a plaintiff's negligence when a professional's1 performance is faulted in a negligence action and (2) to decide whether there is competent evidence in the record which would sustain the jury's verdict.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[ 2 Steve Stroud, individually, [Stroud] and Stroud Crop, Inc. [SCI] brought an action against Arthur Andersen & Co. [Andersen or defendant], a professional accounting firm, seeking damages for economic injuries allegedly emanating from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. LybrandIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Lillard v. StocktonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.