Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Lange
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
Appellees, Lange and Gross, sued appellant to recover for the loss of a lot of hay belonging to them, and destroyed by fire negligently set out by appellant.
The averments of ownership are sufficient, and are not in the nature of mere conclusions from the antecedent facts set forth. They are direct and unequivocal.
It is earnestly insisted by counsel that the judgment should be reversed because the complaint avers a joint cause of action in both plaintiffs, while the proof establishes a several right of action in one only. Conceding without deciding the fact to be as claimed, we do not think…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berkshire v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Brown v. CritchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Steinke v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Singleton v. O'BlenisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. KeithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franklin Insurance v. WolffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Reyer v. BlaisdellColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. MonfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Central Amusement Co. v. VannostranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. KreigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.