Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Kreig
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Fulton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— In the complaint of the appellee against the appellant there were two paragraphs. It is pointed out by counsel for the appellant that the case proceeded on the first paragraph, and all assignments of error having relation to thev second paragraph are expressly waived. Therefore we will not consider such alleged errors.
In the first paragraph it was shown, in substance, that the appellant on the 24th of March, 1895, in running its trains *395and locomotives along its right of way, “carelessly, negligently, and wrongfully failed and omitted to use safe and sufficient spark-arresters, or other…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. German InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Trustees of Tunnelton Lodge No. 168, K. of P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. KeiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.