Legal Opinion

Singleton v. O'Blenis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1890No. 14,359PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Starke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

— This action rests upon a written obligation, executed by the appellant to the appellee O’Blenis, a one-half interest in which he transferred by an equitable assignment to his co-appellee Prettyman.

The appellant addressed a demurrer, assigning several causes, to the complaint, and the court having overruled the same he reserved an exception, and upon proof made, the court rendered judgment for the appellees.

The first objection urged against the complaint is based upon the last clause of section 312, R. S. 1881, which reads : “ But any action brought by the assignee of a claim arising out of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Samson LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Groves v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Slauter v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Humphrey v. FairIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lapham v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Allen v. HollingsheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Sutton v. Roth, Wehrly, Heiny, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API