Legal Opinion

Reyer v. Blaisdell

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1914No. 3911PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hurlbut, J.,

rendered the opinion of the court.

September 24, 1909, plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs below brought this action against defendant in error. The prayer of the complaint ales for judgment in the sum of $22,089.70; and also for general equitable relief. A writ of attachment was sued out in aid of the action and levy made on defenant’s property. The case was tried to the court and it found for defendant, dismissing the action and dissolving the attachment.

The controlling object of the action, as appears from the complaint, is to recover from defendant the sum above specified. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Byxbie v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Mumford v. WrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Bergeron v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Davenport v. BuchananSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carlson v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Siegel Oil Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Eastern Iron & Metal Co. v. PattersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Crist v. United Underwriters, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Beartooth Stock Co. v. GrosscupMontana Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API