Legal Opinion

Nomina v. Eggeman

Putnam County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 1, 1962No. 18104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNeill, J.

Defendant seeks to have a neurological and psychological examination of plaintiff made by doctors practicing at Columbus, Ohio. At first, plaintiff voluntarily agreed, but upon presenting himself, the physician refused to conduct the examination in the presence of plaintiff’s counsel. The request is now made that the court order the same to be made in the absence of plaintiff’s counsel.

The right to order an examination of the plaintiff before a trial is a right exercised by the Court which exists without statutory authority. Hoge v. Soissons, 48 Ohio App., 221; Miami and Montgomery Turnpike…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. S. S. Kresge Co. v. TresterOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Williams v. Chattanooga Iron WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kelley v. Smith & Oby Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stefan v. Trinity Trucking, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Staton v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Demorest v. CsoreyLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1968
  4. Thomas v. Vesper, Unpublished Decision (7-25-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API