Legal Opinion

Williams v. Chattanooga Iron Works

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 18 opinions

FROM SHELBY. ' Ajipeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court. — A. B. Pittman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.. Chief Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff filed his declaration on the 21st day of September, 1914, alleging that by the negligence of the defendant, the Chattanooga Iron Works, he was injured in the following manner: That is to say, while assisting in the insertion of a rivet in some metal sheeting, he *687was struck in the eye by the rivet, by means of which that eye was seriously and permanently injured, and that, as a result thereof, the other eye had also become affected; likewise that other parts of his body were injured. On the 26th of September, the defendant…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bartell v. McCarrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. US SEC. Ins. Co. v. CiminoSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Mapes v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Perkins v. Monongahela Valley Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API