Legal Opinion
State v. Barr
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 2009No. 30,191PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} Pursuant to Rule 12-102(A)(1) NMRA, Joshua Barr (Defendant) appeals his convictions for first degree murder and tampering with evidence, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-2-l(A) (1963, as amended thi-ough 1994) and Section 30-22-5(A) (1963, as amended through 2003), in the shooting death of Robert Lustig (Victim). Defendant argues that his confession was involuntary and should have been suppressed and that the introduction of a videotaped statement by Mark Varkevisser at trial was reversible error. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
A. Factual Background
{2} On…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TorrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.