Legal Opinion

Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 9, 1953No. 17PublishedCited by 1,181 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

A preliminary consideration that is helpful to the solution of this litigation is whether, under 8 CFR § 175.57 (b), 1 the Attorney General has authority to deny to a lawful permanent resident of the United States, who is an alien continuously residing and physically present therein, the opportunity to be heard in opposition to an order for his “permanent exclusion” and consequent deportation, provided the Attorney General determines that the order is based on information of a confidential nature, the disclosure of which would be prejudicial to the public interest. Assuming, as seems to be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,181 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

1,176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API