Legal Opinion

State v. . Holt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

At tbe conclusion of bis Honor’s charge, counsel for defendants requested tbe court to charge tbe jury that if it should be found that tbe money was paid voluntarily by tbe State’s witness to tbe defendant, Bob Holt, and that after tbe payment there was an altercation, and tbe defendant, Bob Holt, struck tbe witness with a pistol, that this would constitute only an assault with a deadly weapon. Tbe trial judge stated: “I think my charge fully covers that. I have instructed them that highway robbery constitutes tbe taking by violence and force, and before you can convict these defendants you…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. State v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API