State v. . Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Indictment for highway robbery, tried before Hoke, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1893, of Edgecombe Superior Court. The defendant was convicted, and- appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cbaek, J.:
Upon inspection of the transcript it appearing that, though the “case on appeal” recited that there was a verdict of guilty and judgment, the record proper failed to show that there had been a trial by jury and to set out the sentence of the Court below, this Court ex mero mota directed an instanter certiorari to suppl}1- the defect, which has now been done.
The indictment sets out two counts, one for highway robbery, second for an attempt to commit the same. The ver- diet found the defendant guilty on the first count. It is therefore unnecessary to consider the exception made to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- McCarty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. . CodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
- State v. . CowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.