State v. . Sawyer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNB, J.
Defendants in. tbe main present and stress for error three points :
1. It is’ contended that tbe court should have nonsuited tbe case, (a) “because no force was shown to have been used,” and (b) that there is a fatal variance between tbe indictment and tbe evidence in that the indictment charges defendants with taking $14.00 in money of tbe goods and chattels of LaBrueque, Sipes and Oliverine, and tbe evidence shows that LaBrueque lost $10,00, Oliverine $3.40, and Sipes $3.60, and neither bad any interest in tbe money of tbe other, and tbe amount taken totaled $17.00 and not $14.00 as charged,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- United States v. Robert WinstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- United States v. Ezekiel GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Kareem DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.