Legal Opinion

State v. . Sawyer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1944PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNB, J.

Defendants in. tbe main present and stress for error three points :

1. It is’ contended that tbe court should have nonsuited tbe case, (a) “because no force was shown to have been used,” and (b) that there is a fatal variance between tbe indictment and tbe evidence in that the indictment charges defendants with taking $14.00 in money of tbe goods and chattels of LaBrueque, Sipes and Oliverine, and tbe evidence shows that LaBrueque lost $10,00, Oliverine $3.40, and Sipes $3.60, and neither bad any interest in tbe money of tbe other, and tbe amount taken totaled $17.00 and not $14.00 as charged,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. United States v. Robert WinstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. United States v. Ezekiel GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Kareem DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API