Legal Opinion
Abbott v. National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1936No. 24741PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county on August 23, 1932 by the National Bank of Commerce of Tu’sa, Okla., as plaintiff against Charles T. Abbott and E. W. Jacob to recover the principal sum of $3,343 35 with interest and attorney’s fee. The action against Jacob was based upon a promissory note executed by him. The liability of Abbott was asserted to exist by reason of an alleged contract of guaranty executed by him.
The cause was submitted to a trial court without the intervention of a jury, and plaintiff prevai’ed against each of the defendants. The court, however…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oklahoma City Nat. Bank v. EzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Masters v. BoyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Scott v. McGirthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Stuart v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Swift & Co. v. ColvertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Burns v. FergusonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Burns v. FergusonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978