Midwest Engineering & Construction Co. v. Electric Regulator Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice:
This appeal involves a controversy growing out of the failure, and refusal, of plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to collectively ■ as “defendants”, or individually as “Midwest”, a Tulsa corporation, and “Patterson”, another Tulsa corporation, to pay for a number of the 611 Kilowatt Meters and Voltage Regulators Midwest had ordered from defendant in error, a Connecticut corporation, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”, to enable Midwest to comply with a U. S. Government contract it had obtained through the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers with district headquarters…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bu-Vi-Bar Petroleum Corporation v. KrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Woods Lumber Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- McGowan v. Wells' TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Cole-McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. HollowayTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. NatarelliNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Hidalgo Properties, Inc. v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S Chemical, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- LPCX CORP. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Home-Stake Production Company v. MinnisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.