Legal Opinion

T. & H. Smith & Co. v. Thesmann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1908No. 1888, Okla. TPublishedCited by 16 opinions

Okla. T. Error from the District Court, Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Judge. Action by T. & H. Smith & Co. against Prank Thesmann on agreement of guaranty. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

PIayes, J..

On July 29, 18.99, D. H. Tessman, who then resided at Henderson, Neb., made, executed, and delivered to plaintiff T. & H. Smith & Co., a corporation, with its place of business at Pekin, 111., a certain written order and contract for goods, which order was delivered to R. C. Stephens, the agent of the plaintiff, and which order is a follows:

"Henderson, Neb. 9-29-1899.
"T. & H. Smith & Co., Pekin, 111.:
"Please ship at once, or as soon thereafter as possible, the following goods:

No. of ■ Jobs 20 Size 31-4 Depth of Box 26 Tire R Style Brake B Price

$45.50

25 Slip tops 6 boxes 112 F. O.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Bank of Guntersville v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. McKesson v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Oklahoma City Nat. Bank v. EzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Green v. Cox MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. McDonald v. McKinney Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API