Legal Opinion
Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Stott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1946No. 11669PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit by oil and gas lessors for damages to their leases alleged to have resulted from lessees’ recycling operations on neighboring lands.
The appellees, Elizabeth Jansing, Virginia Young Stott, and Mae Young Lub-ben, plaintiffs below, executed separate oil and gas leases in 1935 and 1937, covering their respective tracts of 25, 109.35, and 72.04 acres in the John Adams Survey, Anderson County, Texas. The appellants, Tide Water Associated Oil Company and Seaboard Oil Company of Delaware, defendants below, now own these leases except for an assignment to Flaynes B.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Rhoads Drilling Co. v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Hutchins v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Humphreys Oil Co. v. TatumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Greyhound Leasing & Financial Corporation, on Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated v. Joiner City UnitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- The CALIFORNIA CO. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Pickens v. Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Corley v. Mississippi State Oil & Gas BoardMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.