Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1949No. 9774PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is a Rule 37 case on appeal from orders of the Railroad Commission granting a permit to appellants Pickens and Cof-field to drill well No. 1 on their lots Nos. 10’ and 11 in Block 23, Hawkins Townsite, Wood County, Texas, in the Hawkins Oil Field, and denying a permit to Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corporation to drill a well on their adjacent lots 12 and 13. The Humble Oil Refining Company intervened as co-plaintiff with Ryan in attacking the Pickens permit, and with the Railroad Commission in defending the denial of the Ryan *152application, and remaining neutral as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sharpe v. Landowners Oil Assn.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Keegan v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. Barmore v. DarraghCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Business Men's Oil Co. v. PriddyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Coates v. De GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp. v. PickensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. South End Development Co. v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API