Legal Opinion

Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1943No. 8033PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

This suit involves the construction of an oil and gas mining contract. The material question to be determined is whether^ or not certain royalty or mineral payments provided for therein were to be based on the value of the crude gas mined from the premises, or its value after the gas had been processed and manufactured into other products.

*155Danciger Oil and Relneries, Inc., will be referred to as Danciger, and Hamill Drilling Company et al will be referred to as Hamill. The material facts are these. Danciger owned oil and gas mining leases on about 5,000 acres of land in Brazoria County, in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Garman v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Le Cuno Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. West v. Alpar Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Martin v. GlassDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  5. Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API