Legal Opinion

Amoco Production Co. v. Alexander

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1981No. B-9131PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is an action by royalty owners for damages because of field-wide drainage. The trial court, after a jury verdict, rendered judgment for the Alexanders, lessors, for actual and exemplary damages against Amoco, lessee. The Court of Civil Appeals reformed the trial court’s judgment and affirmed the judgment as reformed. 594 S.W.2d 467. We modify the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirm the judgment as modified.

The Hastings, West Field, in Brazoria County, is a water-drive field. Water and oil are in the same reservoir. Because water is heavier than oil, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1986

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API