Sollar v. Sollar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
At the opening of the trial plaintiff dismissed her cause of action. The case went to trial on defendant’s cross-bill and plaintiff’s answer thereto. A jury was waived. Several separate findings of fact, each of which, if sustained by the evidence, is decisive of the case, were made by the trial court. After hearing the oral arguments and examining the assignments of error, briefs and record, the evidence is found sufficient to sustain at least two decisive findings of fact which cannot here be disturbed on the ground of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. CraysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Newport v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Snell v. SnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Locksted v. LockstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940